To separate the namespace (SmalltalkDictionary) from all the image
related tasks (SmalltalkImage).

On Monday, June 7, 2010, Germán Leiva <[email protected]> wrote:
> I expected that but what's the reason behind that change?
>
> The entry is http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2136
>
> 2010/6/7 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>
>
>
> On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:32 AM, Germán Leiva wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a doubt ...
>>
>> why in Pharo 1.0
>>
>> Smalltalk class == SystemDictionary
>>
>> and in Pharo 1.1
>>
>> Smalltalk class == SmalltalkImage?
>
> Yes this is normal
>
> now Smalltalk globals class == SystemDictionary
>
>>  Looking at the issue tracker (thanks Carla):
>> We should make
>>
>> - Smalltalk pointing to SmalltalkImage current
>> - have SystemDictionary only having classbindings management.
>> and Smalltalk globals pointing to SystemDictionary instance.
>
> this is done.
> which entry is that?
>>
>> This way we finish the refactoring started long time ago.
>> We should have a look at the way this was done in Squeak so that we get the 
>> same
>> compatible for now solution.
>>
>> What's involved in the refactoring started long time ago and what's the 
>> motivation for it?
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Germán Leiva
>> [email protected]
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> --
> Germán Leiva
> [email protected]
>

-- 
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to