On Jun 17, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Julian Fitzell wrote: > 2010/6/17 Marcus Denker <[email protected]>: >> >> On Jun 17, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: >> >> - If included with Pharo I suggest to rename all the methods, >> otherwise we will run into big troubles with Seaside and other >> projects that depend on Grease. >> >> >> From a philosophical standpoint, I *hate* that. this means that as a >> plattform, we can not >> grow and improve our libraris anymore? >> Shouldn't be the goal that useful extensions gets adopted by the core? > > We will need to find a way to allow platforms to adopt Grease methods > - I do think this is the end goal. It's a bit of a nightmare from our > point of view because we end up having to have different Grease > versions for different versions of the platforms, but isn't that sort > of unavoidable in the long run anyway?
because you were planning to have only one grease for all the platform. Ok this was not obvious. > Part of the reason that's so > awful is simply due to the lack of good branching and management tools > in our version control systems... But did you try metacello? Because I thought it was good for that kind of managament Stef > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
