On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 17, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Julian Fitzell wrote: > >> 2010/6/17 Marcus Denker <[email protected]>: >>> >>> On Jun 17, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: >>> >>> - If included with Pharo I suggest to rename all the methods, >>> otherwise we will run into big troubles with Seaside and other >>> projects that depend on Grease. >>> >>> >>> From a philosophical standpoint, I *hate* that. this means that as a >>> plattform, we can not >>> grow and improve our libraris anymore? >>> Shouldn't be the goal that useful extensions gets adopted by the core? >> >> We will need to find a way to allow platforms to adopt Grease methods >> - I do think this is the end goal. It's a bit of a nightmare from our >> point of view because we end up having to have different Grease >> versions for different versions of the platforms, but isn't that sort >> of unavoidable in the long run anyway? > > because you were planning to have only one grease for all the platform. > Ok this was not obvious.
No, there are packages for each platform. What we don't yet have is separate packages for different *versions* of a platform. But that may be unavoidable over time... Julian _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
