Eliot,

It sounds as though you have the right idea.  Here's hoping you are able to 
release it.

Bill


________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eliot Miranda
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 4:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] 1.2 vision



On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Stéphane Ducasse 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

On Jun 29, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

> Stef,
>
> It all sounds great.  I probably care less about Alien than I do about what 
> it is supposed to do well: callbacks.  We need callbacks, and we need to be 
> able to do callbacks that return double.  That can come from Alien, Native 
> Boost, or a plugin that makes FFI able to handle callbacks.  Callbacks should 
> not come at a cost of making every call harder to do, which **might** be the 
> case with Alien.

the only way to make progress on this front is to propose some code.

> It would also be nice to have an analog to Dolphin's overlapped calls (calls 
> made on a separate thread that block only the calling Smalltalk process, and 
> not the entire image).

I think that eliot is working on threaded something for Cog

We have a functional prototype that does overlapped calls.  Its a 
multi-threaded VM based on David Simmons' ideas that allows only one thread to 
execute Smalltalk at any one time.  Again I can't say anything either way as to 
when or whether this will be released.  But we did finally release Cog , so at 
least there's a precedent :)

>
> SSL would also be nice.  Overlapped calls would greatly simplify creating it, 
> as then one could safely use OpenSSL's blocking calls on separate threads.  
> The alternative is to do non-blocking calls, which is considerably more work 
> than letting the OS handle the multi-tasking.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>  
> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
>  On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse
> Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 3:32 AM
> To: Pharo Development
> Subject: [Pharo-project] 1.2 vision
>
> Hi all
>
> Of course we will integrate changes and changes and improvements.... now I 
> believe that it would be nice to build a common vision. Here what I would 
> like to get in 1.2.
>
> Now it does not mean that this is a definitive list and that we will have the 
> energy to do all but like that you know that you can put energy do build this 
> common vision :)
>
>       - better infrastructure for integrating rb composite queries into the 
> system
>               The idea is to introduce a superclass on top of 
> systemDictionary and to define there an API that
>               is compatible with the one of RB (and potentially modified the 
> one of RB)
>
>       - another step towards using announcement for system notification
>
>       - better tools for dev
>
>       - have a look at the RB change model so that we could get a real undo 
> and changes
>
>       - clean Monticello so that package logic stays in package so that we 
> can plug RPackage into the system.
>       Right now this looks too brittle to do anything
>
>       - make sure that we can have RPackage on the side of PakageInfo (we got 
> really nice benchmark)
>
>       - New Compiler in beta
>
>       - Helvetia hooks
>
>       - ROME API
>
>       - Sophie Event Hierarchy
>
>       - Define some architectural action to get the system more modular
>
>       - Hudson infrastructure
>
>       - metacello to manage core
>
>       - metacelloRepository for 1.0/1.1/1.2
>               Gofer
>
>       - squeak collection optimisation?
>
>       - Alien
>
> Open points:
>
>       - What do we do with ToolBuilder? Not clear to me.
>
>       - What should be done at the level of polymorph?
>               - What should be done a the level of Pluggable****
>                       can we use the fact that we have now block closure to 
> get it better.
>
> As you guess it will not come simply but this is important that we all head 
> towards a common understanding
>
>
> Stef
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to