I do not see why 3d is different from 2d. You get a spec and a builder and you generate the ui or the spec Now I hope somebody will take over what you did and focus on a good 2d one
On Jul 1, 2010, at 9:25 AM, nullPointer wrote: > > >> Then how using an external tools can make sure that this tool got well the > way layoutMorph >> and other works? > > A smalltalk object must be the responsible of that, in the image. In 2d > don´t exists differences in layouts policy. I believe the problem is > implement in Morphic the 3d effects I did see in some ui designs of > WPF-XAML. A new set of controls is needed, I believe. > > Well, I don´t want to debate that problems; I already say before that is for > Smalltalk gurús, not is only a new ui builder. Exists much more problems. > > Regards > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/CLFramework-and-Pharo-tp2273256p2274707.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
