Stef,

Just to have a better grasp of your reasoning: Are you suggesting we put 
annotations in a method and just have it/them lumped in an 'Annotations' 
protocol or are you suggesting a more radical change which will require the 
toolset to have changes in sync to them?
 



Em 08/07/2010 11:48, Stéphane Ducasse < [email protected] > escreveu:
May be using a class method?
But yes this would be important.

Alex if we use comment we would have to parse them and this is not good.

Stef

On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> while it is possible to annotate methods using Pragmas,
> what about classes?
> 
> Thx
> T.
> -- 
> GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to