I just said that we do not need a big infrastructure. We have methods / class 
methods and pragma so it should
be enough.

Stef

On Jul 10, 2010, at 2:25 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> Stef,
> 
> 
> Just to have a better grasp of your reasoning: Are you suggesting we put 
> annotations in a method and just have it/them lumped in an 'Annotations' 
> protocol or are you suggesting a more radical change which will require the 
> toolset to have changes in sync to them?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Em 08/07/2010 11:48, Stéphane Ducasse < [email protected] > escreveu:
> May be using a class method?
> But yes this would be important.
> 
> Alex if we use comment we would have to parse them and this is not good.
> 
> Stef
> 
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> while it is possible to annotate methods using Pragmas,
>> what about classes?
>> 
>> Thx
>> T.
>> -- 
>> GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
>> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to