ok!!!! sorry I need to eat :) On Aug 4, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Henrik Johansen wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2010, at 12:46 06PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >>> Why was SmalltalkImage >> os marked as deprecated? >>> I thought the result of previous discussion was that the methods themselves >>> should be moved to separate classes (like OSPlatform), but the delegating >>> method in SmalltalkImage should be kept... >> >> if we have OSPlatform as in Sophie and all the infrastructure there (like >> isUnix, isMacOS...) do we want to duplicate it in SmalltalkImage? >> (except for compatibility with squeak). >> >> Ideally Smalltalk should be a simple lightweight lobby to access behavior >> >> Smalltalk platform >> -> OSPlatform >> Smalltalk vm >> Smalltalk globals. >> >> Stef > > My point exactly. > I don't mind SmalltalkImage>>osVersion being deprecated, but the "lightweight > lobby" delegate method SmalltalkImage >> os has been deprecated as well... > (There is no corresponding SmalltalkImage >> platform as you mentioned) > > Cheers, > Henry > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
