On Aug 30, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> I agree with Andreas that the process for including packages in Pharo
> is not transparent (at least not me).
read the open and transparent discussions that happened over the past months in
this mailing-list: check for webClient in the title :)
For pharo: this is really simple
- we discuss in the mailing-list
- reach a consensus
- act.
Tell me once you will have read the mails if this is not what we did and how we
could improve them.
I would like to have the same process than python but we are too small for that
right now.
> Dont know the process
> for Squeak either - but at least we all should take care to keep the
> whole platform and forks open. Maybe the license should be a
> required field in Squeaksource for any new project.
>
> Havent followed the whole thread - but I still wonder what the reason
> for Andreas is to not release Webclient as MIT? Especially since I think
> it could be a nice addition to the standard images (Squeak, Pharo or
> whatever) ...
>
> Bye
> T.
>
>
> --
> GMX DSL SOMMER-SPECIAL: Surf & Phone Flat 16.000 für nur 19,99 ¿/mtl.!*
> http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
