Hi, a good new, Gofer works fine for me :-) ...and test results for kernel, network, Monticello and Gofer are quite good.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I uploaded a new version of PharoKernel. It has several new properties: >> - better scripts processing >> - separate dictionaries for images, scripts, reports and downloaded packages >> - It is able to load Network, Monticello and Gopher (image included), >> however it needs some next fixes to work properly >> - ImageMap and ImageGraph included in the archive >> >> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27699/PharoKernel-1.2-12217.zip >> >> The most important thing that should be done in Pharo is to split >> Tests package to be able to load Monticello tests separately. > > Yes > and that they follow the pattern > >> If Monticello and Gofer will work well then it should be quite simple >> to prepare PharoCore Configuration to load the rest of PharoCore. > > Yes this is the vision but now our problem is to port our integration process > to it. > We will certainly changes it anyway because it slows us down (does not scale) > but it requires to have a good alternative. Well, Configurations were always suspicious to me - they do not even share a common superclass :-) -- Pavel > > Stef >
