So....soon we will be able to prepare a Seaside 30 Pharo Kernel image? :):):):):):)
Since we have Monticello.... great!! On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > a good new, Gofer works fine for me :-) > ...and test results for kernel, network, Monticello and Gofer are quite > good. > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I uploaded a new version of PharoKernel. It has several new properties: > >> - better scripts processing > >> - separate dictionaries for images, scripts, reports and downloaded > packages > >> - It is able to load Network, Monticello and Gopher (image included), > >> however it needs some next fixes to work properly > >> - ImageMap and ImageGraph included in the archive > >> > >> > https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27699/PharoKernel-1.2-12217.zip > >> > >> The most important thing that should be done in Pharo is to split > >> Tests package to be able to load Monticello tests separately. > > > > Yes > > and that they follow the pattern > > > >> If Monticello and Gofer will work well then it should be quite simple > >> to prepare PharoCore Configuration to load the rest of PharoCore. > > > > Yes this is the vision but now our problem is to port our integration > process to it. > > We will certainly changes it anyway because it slows us down (does not > scale) but it requires to have a good alternative. > > Well, Configurations were always suspicious to me - they do not even > share a common superclass :-) > > -- Pavel > > > > > Stef > > > >
