I see well your problem.
We want to have symbol without getting with it the parser and compiler.
three questions
- can we package isLiteralSymbol: with compiler?
- what are the senders?
- else do we have an alternate implementation not relying on scanner?
Stef
> Hello,
>
> I wonder why the method isLiteralSymbol: is in the Scanner methodDict instead
> of the Symbol (or maybe String) one ?
>
> Moreover there is no reference to self or variable in this method ...
>
>
> And due to this method, there is a dependence between Symbol and Scanner (and
> then the Compiler)
>
>
>
> Thank you for answering another one of my noob questions ^^
>
>
>
> Ben
>
