On Nov 24, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I see well your problem.
We want to have symbol without getting with it the parser and
compiler.
three questions
- can we package isLiteralSymbol: with compiler?
- what are the senders?
- else do we have an alternate implementation not relying on scanner?
Stef
I've see with Marcus how to reverse the dependencies to have Symbol
without Scanner.
I've posted the cs on Bug Entry, but I can't charge the cs, dunno
why ...
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3283
Ben
