Hi, I think I understand your point of view, but I do not agree with it :).
Moose is a valuable platform exactly because it is built in Smalltalk. Developers understand the power of Smalltalk in the context of Moose quite quickly after they do a couple of tutorials. The result is that they end up wanting to learn Smalltalk. In fact, I argued for quite a while that vendors should use Moose to promote Smalltalk. The cool thing about it is that it addresses directly programmers that develop in all sorts of languages (especially Java). This gives us a nice back door. Cheers, Doru On 28 Nov 2010, at 18:48, [email protected] wrote: > Tudor, > > This kind of report shows that Moose is a useful piece of software. The > interest in > Pharo became contingent on the Moose technology such as ABAP is 'widespread' > in the > industry because of SAP ERP. > > I think it says a lot about Moose, but is not enough to be a sales argument > for Pharo. > > This leads to a common fallacy used in marketing: use "X" as all successful > people use "X" as well..." > > -- > Cesar Rabak > > > Em 27/11/2010 07:23, Tudor Girba < [email protected] > escreveu: > Hi, > > I recently introduced Pharo in a small-medium software company > (parametrix.ch). They use it for Moose (moosetechnology.org) to analyze their > systems written in various languages and to introduce an assessment approach > in their day to day development process (humane-assessment.com). A number of > them are now learning to program in Pharo and Moose. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 26 Nov 2010, at 22:07, laurent laffont wrote: > >> Indeed I don't want a "how to integrate Pharo into enterprise", I want a >> "actually I have introduce Pharo in my enterprise and why; what works and >> what doesn't". >> >> Laurent. >> > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
