yes we should have done that

On Dec 9, 2010, at 11:44 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:

> I said it before: just give the variable a different name. For example, 
> textStyle. That would solve all loading problems.
> 
> Doru
> 
> 
> On 9 Dec 2010, at 22:49, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> 
>> Thanks all for your time.
>> We should try to do it better in the future.
>> We should also change and improve our tools for helping us being better. 
>> 
>> Now something important is how can we move this style variable in a way that 
>> we can move it and also avoid to break.
>> this is just an example: let us do an analysis of the problems and learn for 
>> the next cycle.
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>> 
>>>> I guess I'm the one who made all this bad changes.
>>>> So sorry, sorry sorry.
>>> 
>>> I don't think so.
>>> 
>>>> Maybe we can come back to the "old" one.
>>>> No problem for me.
>>> 
>>> I think the main problem is that the new editor model (which I really
>>> like) was merged directly into the existing editor morphs, so
>>> everything that uses more than just the morphs breaks.
>>> 
>>>> I can make a slice in that direction.
>>> 
>>> I am not sure if this is possible anymore, because now we have
>>> dependencies on PluggableTextMorph and friends with the old API and
>>> dependencies on PluggableTextMorph and friends with the new API.
>>> 
>>>> But frankly, what a catastrophic mail for people who are trying
>>>> to make the system cleaner.
>>>> do you know how much of my free time I've spent to make the undo/redo work 
>>>> again?
>>>> Maybe one can just simply ask for help instead of blaming.
>>> 
>>> I am *not criticizing* the system cleanup. I am criticizing the
>>> changes that didn't go through a deprecation phase. It started with
>>> the introduction of the 'style' variable in a commonly used
>>> superclass. The problem was discussed a long time ago and I was shut
>>> up; today the problem turns out to be way worse.
>>> 
>>>> OCompletion works and it includes ECompletion. Since I added a setting
>>>> for using ECompletion instead of OCompletion (and not just as a fallback
>>>> mechanism), ECompletion is also working with the new editors.
>>> 
>>> I looked at the OCompletion changes and tried to merge them into
>>> eCompletion, but as Francisco says it is only kinda working.
>>> 
>>> Lukas
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Lukas Renggli
>>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> 
> "Every thing has its own flow."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to