Thanks john. Some people think that we are just total idiot and reality is somehow different and fun to look at it.
Stef On Dec 31, 2010, at 1:57 AM, John McIntosh wrote: > Well the question as pointed out was does this vm support weak object > finalization? and since all closure vm support finalization, then > asking the question was mute, so it was ditched. Sophie from the 2003 > era had to ask. > > > On 12/30/10, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hopefully that can eventually be said as "backward compatibility with good >> stuff is a priority for Pharo." Moving targets are perhaps best left >> moving for now. >> >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: [email protected] >> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Levente Uzonyi >> [[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 6:13 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] WeakArray>>isFinalizationSupported >> >> (or so) which is unrelated. The method was removed during a "cleanup". And >> as you know, backwards compatibility is not a priority for Pharo. >> >> >> Levente >> >> >> > > > -- > =========================================================================== > John M. McIntosh <[email protected]> > Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com > =========================================================================== >
