On 31 December 2010 11:03, Nicolas Cellier
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On the other hand, if old packages are usefull, they should be
> maintained and upgraded.
>
> If Pharo wants to remove these deprecated methods, an alternative
> policy is to move deprecated methods in a separate backward
> compatibility package.
>

+1
I would call it 'Pharo-Cruft'
:)

> Nicolas
>
> 2010/12/31 Levente Uzonyi <[email protected]>:
>> On Thu, 30 Dec 2010, John McIntosh wrote:
>>
>>> Well the question as pointed out was does this vm support weak object
>>> finalization? and since all closure vm support finalization, then
>>> asking the question was mute, so it was ditched. Sophie from the 2003
>>> era had to ask.
>>
>> The need for the check it outdated, but the method is still sent by external
>> packages. With proper deprecation policy the method would be still
>> available. It would simply return true and raise a deprecation warning.
>>
>>
>> Levente
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/30/10, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully that can eventually be said as "backward compatibility with
>>>> good
>>>> stuff is a priority for Pharo."   Moving targets are perhaps best left
>>>> moving for now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Levente Uzonyi
>>>> [[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 6:13 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] WeakArray>>isFinalizationSupported
>>>>
>>>> (or so) which is unrelated. The method was removed during a "cleanup".
>>>> And
>>>> as you know, backwards compatibility is not a priority for Pharo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Levente
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ===========================================================================
>>> John M. McIntosh <[email protected]>
>>> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
>>>
>>> ===========================================================================
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Reply via email to