On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Guillermo Polito <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> looks cool now how can I sahre the same spec between two contexts?
>>>
>>
>> That's problem #2 and ortogonal to shortcuts UI I think.  Shouldn't we
>> have the ability to export all our settings?  Not only key bindings from one
>> place and colors from other place...
>>
>>
>
> There is. In the settings browser, in the top left where it says "Style",
> choose new...
>

But it does not change dinamically, does it?  I should add the default
shortcut loading into that setting classes, and that doesn't look fine :).


>
> In addition, Alain said once to add "partial settings saving" where you can
> jusst save some settings and not all. I am not sure its state.
>
> cheers
>
> mariano
>
>
>>
>>> On Dec 31, 2010, at 12:28 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,  I would like to discuss the UI for shortcuts and not to impose it
>>> :). So..
>>> >
>>> > I was exploring the Idea of configuring the shortcuts in settings as
>>> the screenshot shows.  What do you think of that?  I don't think we need a
>>> separated tool to configure shortcuts.  Settings look ok.
>>> >
>>> > Tomorrow I'll be putting a lot of effort on it ;).
>>> >
>>> > Cheers!
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > I also would like a cmd+f: search anything... but that needs also an
>>> application (like algernon, which I'm currently not supporting anymore due
>>> time issues), not just a command :(
>>> > well, at least a cmd+f: search class would be fine :)
>>> >
>>> > +1
>>> > It sound like a good project for someone with time and wanting to learn
>>> :)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > El 27/12/2010, a las 5:38a.m., Stéphane Ducasse escribió:
>>> >
>>> > > I suggest that you define lists =
>>> > >
>>> > > simple eamcs bindings =
>>> > >       ctral a ctrle
>>> > >
>>> > > Windows manipulation
>>> > >       cmd W
>>> > >       ...
>>> > >
>>> > > Your special binding
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Then you should have contexts
>>> > >       World
>>> > >       TextMorph
>>> > >       Editor only
>>> > >
>>> > >       (of course some list will only be able to be attached to a
>>> given object programmatically
>>> > >       example: for botsinc I wanted specific binding to that morph
>>> class only -- but you do not care)
>>> > >
>>> > > then a config is
>>> > >
>>> > >       (lists, lists) context
>>> > >       (mybinding, lists, lists) context
>>> > >
>>> > > where , make sure that mybinding take precedence
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Does it make sense?
>>> > >
>>> > > Stef
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Dec 27, 2010, at 2:37 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> What about something like the attach?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Guillermo Polito <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >> Wow, haha, this is wonderful!  So, putting some order:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> 1) shortcuts published as settings with a default?  Will that be ok?
>>>  This make me think the following:
>>> > >> - how to share shortcuts. Files?  Keymapping used to use SIXX, but
>>> maybe it is not suitable for a light solution (I don't know much about SIXX)
>>> > >> - downloading a new image (or a new version of a package with
>>> shortcuts) could make us lose our own-defined shortcuts.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> 2) support for the following shortcuts:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> - a shortcut to bring up the wolrd menu. Not sure which shortcut.
>>> > >> - use ctrl + tab  to switch between windows instead of cmd + arrows
>>> > >> - a shortcut for what it is (hidden) now with cmd + shift + click
>>>  (list of opened windows)
>>> > >> - Shortcuts for opening standard tools: Workspace, Transcript,
>>> TestRunner, etc.
>>> > >> - Shortcut for duplicating a windows
>>> > >> - a shortcut for saving the image (cmd+ shoft + s ?)
>>> > >> - a shortcut for quitting the image with and without saving
>>> > >> - a shortcut to see a list of shortcuts
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I would like to add some more items to #2, and to define the keys
>>> that triggers them.
>>> > >> #1 seems to be of some work :).  I'll work on it ASAP.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Step by step, as Stef and Mostaza Merlo says :).
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Cheers!
>>> > >> Guille
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >> + 1 :)
>>> > >> And save them as configuration
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>> my wishlist:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> - a shortcut to see all available shortcuts and change them
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> + a lot
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> <PharoScreenshot.2.png>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > <shortcuts.png>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to