Hi, Maybe I am a bit late with this question, I also don't know who makes the decision, and it is probably external people who have to make the judgement, but would it be possible and/or a good idea to include Zinc HTTP Components into Pharo 1.2 Dev ?
In any case, the code is in good shape, works on 1.2, has a reasonable number of tests, has comments, is pretty small and elegant. Whether or not to load the Zinc-Patch-HTTPSocket package is another question. This package patches (destructively overwrites) class methods in HTTPSocket, redirecting them to ZnHTTPSocketFacade, effectively steering all HTTP client access in your Smalltalk image through Zinc HTTP Components. This has been working for me for months, but my usage is certainly not universal. So maybe this should remain an option. I would especially like to expose this code to more people to get more feedback. I am also willing to keep on supporting the code. What do you think ? Sven
