Thanks by the explanations Dale. Thanks Guillermo and Markus by the points.
Until moment any way of installation I tried failed with different sort of messages. By now I downloaded the ready image pointed by Markus but would like to build my own. Thanks! 2011/2/4 Dale Henrichs <[email protected]>: > Sure: > > http://gemstonesoup.wordpress.com/2011/01/17/metacello-1-0-beta-28-unearthed/ > > Be sure to look at the section of development cycle ... and tools support, > too... > > Dale > > On Feb 4, 2011, at 6:37 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > Dale, Is there a place where I can read how to configure the symbolic > versions? > > Thx! > Guille :) > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Dale Henrichs > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > ConfigurationOfPharo should have a #stable symbolic version defined that > specifies the version that should be used in 1.2, 1.1, and 1.0 ... then one > just loads the #stable version: > > (ConfigurationOfPharo project version: #stable) load > > and you'll get the right version loaded for the platform version ... even > though the version is under development I think it is valid to specify a > #stable symbolic version for Pharo1.2, just so folks don't have to ask this > question over and over again ... Don't let the name 'stable' scare you ... > > The intent is that the #stable symbolic version specifies the version that > should be loaded .... the developer decides which versions are #stable for > each platform version and when a new version becomes "the version to use" the > developer updates the specification. > > The users of a configuration shouldn't have to think ... remember in the past > the recommended pattern was: > > ConfigurationOfPharo project latestVersion load > > and that worked fine until Pharo1.1 and Pharo1.2 were introduced. The > expression: > > (ConfigurationOfPharo project version: #stable) load > > is intended to replace the use of #latestVersion because it makes it possible > to explicitly specify the "latest version" on a platform by platform and > platform version basis... > > Sorry if I appear to be ranting ... I'm just trying to get the message out:) > > Dale > > On Feb 4, 2011, at 6:01 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > I'm Using '1.2-beta2'. > > Should we remove invalid and unused versions? I'll add a few comments at > lunch time ;) > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Germán Arduino > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>> > wrote: > I tried the 2 latest Beta and fail, also the 1.1 version fail. > > Which ConfigurationOfPharo I should use with Pharo 1.2 ? > > Cheers. > > > > > > > > -- ================================================= Germán S. Arduino <gsa @ arsol.net> Twitter: garduino Arduino Software & Web Hosting http://www.arduinosoftware.com PasswordsPro http://www.passwordspro.com =================================================
