Hi, Unless there is a scalability issue, I would not discard anything from squeaksource. I believe the evolution is too valuable to simply drop it.
But, maybe there are practical reasons. In any case, the idea of having programatic access is really cool. I would love to use that for analysis purposes. Cheers, Doru On 6 Apr 2011, at 18:46, Janko Mivšek wrote: > On 06. 04. 2011 18:34, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> Wow, looks great! >> >> I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from >> SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has >> accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years... > > But still there can be something good and valuable. I'd migrate that > with some #archive tag or something. > > The same goes with code from other Smalltalks. Like Smalltalk Goodies > archive back from 90's, there are quite some interesting code, which I'm > still using. > > Best regards > Janko > > > >> >> Cheers, >> Adrian >> >> >> On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility >>> to migrate the existing squeaksource there? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We've been working on a new code repository & project management >>>> application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub. >>>> >>>> If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. >>>> The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment >>>> (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub). >>>> >>>> Here's a screenshot in the meantime. >>>> http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nicolas >>>> -- >>>> Nicolas Petton >>>> http://www.nicolas-petton.fr > > > -- > Janko Mivšek > Aida/Web > Smalltalk Web Application Server > http://www.aidaweb.si > -- www.tudorgirba.com "One cannot do more than one can do."
