.. and I see Metacello as a nice next step for SmalltalkHub: Metacello based projects can be regarded as: serious, maintained, trustful,.. in any case, those projects will be separated by itself from all other code.
So we won't need to care much about those not much useful code in the repository... Janko On 07. 04. 2011 05:23, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Randal, > > Managing packages on a per platform basis is one of the things that Metacello > was designed to do ... > > Dale > > On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >>>>>>> "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <[email protected]> writes: >> >> Serge> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz >> Serge> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich <[email protected]> writes: >>>> >> Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) >>>> >>>> Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. >> >> Serge> There was no announcement on squeak-dev. >> Serge> Nicolas forget about that i guess. >> >> OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the "tagging" >> issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a >> package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that >> require it? >> >> -- >> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 >> <[email protected]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> >> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. >> See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion >> > > > -- Janko Mivšek Svetovalec za informatiko Eranova d.o.o. Ljubljana, Slovenija www.eranova.si tel: 01 514 22 55 faks: 01 514 22 56 gsm: 031 674 565
