On May 12, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> sooo.. opinions?
> 

We can add the class the the compatiblity package...


> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> If Cog really needs it we should create a separate repostiroy like 
> PharoCogSupport and put the class there and add it as a dependency of Cog in 
> ConfigurationOfCog. 
> Another hacky way is to add a #preLoadDoit:   in ConfigurationOfCog that does 
> a #compile: of AbstractLauncher
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Mariano
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> AbstractLauncher was removed in: 
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4002
> 
> Cog has a subclass from AbstractLauncher called CommandLineLauncher, hence, 
> it cannot be loaded anymore
> 
> CommandLineLauncher has no class comment and no sender. So I have no idea 
> what it does, nor if it can be removed from cog, nor how to solve this 
> problem in Pharo. 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- 
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> 

--
Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.


Reply via email to