On 05/17/2011 09:53 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > On 16 May 2011 19:13, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >> mariano >> >> There was a crash and we spend some couple of hours with marcus to see what >> we can >> do. Now apparently the applications does not find some of the files that are >> on the filesystem. >> So the code is not lost but squeaksource does not see them. >> >> This has nothing with Pharo and Smalltalk. Just that Squeaksource was >> created in 2002 >> and that it suffers from the success of Squeak and Pharo. >> > > Indeed. It was not designed to be used in such big scale as today. So, > it is not a bug, it is a feature (or lack of ;) > And as any other software it requires maintenance and upgrades to meet > today's requirements. > >> Now this is why ESUG payed objectFusion to propose a new application. >> > > Is there a plan to provide a migration from squeaksource to new system? > Because if not, then i'm afraid, most people will keep using SqS > and imagine how many configs/wiki pages and other stuff needs to be updated. > I'd prefer to fully replace SqS with new system at some day without > need of migrating projects by all developers and updating > links/configs etc.
If you don't care about metadata it should be pretty easy to come up a shell script that downloads all versions of a project from SqueakSource and uploads when to a new place. Cheers Philippe
