Em 16/05/2011 14:13, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> escreveu:
> mariano > There was a crash and we spend some couple of hours with marcus to > see what we can do. Now apparently the applications does not find > some of the files that are on the filesystem. So the code is not > lost but squeaksource does not see them. > This has nothing with Pharo and Smalltalk. Just that Squeaksource > was created in 2002 and that it suffers from the success of Squeak > and Pharo. > Now this is why ESUG payed objectFusion to propose a new > application. > > Now again if you give me one engineer full time I'm sure that we > can do that. Do you think that svn or git where created from the > air without sponsoring......? Just curious. Stef, Incurring on the risk of sounding like a cat in the Birds of a Feather, I think the attempt to compare svn or git efforts to SqS (or the whole Monticello infra, for the matter) is not correct, because in former the solutions span a wider "audience" with more than a technology/platform/language, whereas the latter is Squeak/Pharo specific. In Smalltalk we have for each flavor a different version control system! To avoid misunderstandings and/or a stretching of this thread without necessity, let assure you folks I _do_ know the aformentioned systems are "file based" and Smalltalk is different, etc., but my observation is /orthogonal/ to this. my 0.0199999... -- Cesar Rabak
