Hmm, I did not see the discussion. So, does it mean that we should rescue the old classes and put them in a separate package?
Cheers, Doru On 18 May 2011, at 16:42, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > There is no user of these classes in a 1.2. And nobody shouted against its > removal. > This was a reason good enough to remove them :-) > > Alexandre > > > On 18 May 2011, at 10:36, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> I guess there was a reason behind removing them, and I also guess that the >> best way would be to find what is the other preferred solution besides >> adding them back :). Or was there removal a mistake? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> On 18 May 2011, at 16:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >>> I also bumped into the same problem. For the case of Mondrian, I will copy >>> the missing classes into Mondrian. >>> These classes were removed quite some times ago from Pharo 1.3 >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>> On 18 May 2011, at 08:54, Tudor Girba wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Circle seems to be gone from Pharo 1.3. >>>> >>>> What is now the preferred way to specify a circle? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Doru >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>> >>>> "When people care, great things can happen." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." >> >> >> >> > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
