On May 18, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hmm, I did not see the discussion.
me neither. > > So, does it mean that we should rescue the old classes and put them in a > separate package? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 18 May 2011, at 16:42, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> There is no user of these classes in a 1.2. And nobody shouted against its >> removal. >> This was a reason good enough to remove them :-) >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 18 May 2011, at 10:36, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> I guess there was a reason behind removing them, and I also guess that the >>> best way would be to find what is the other preferred solution besides >>> adding them back :). Or was there removal a mistake? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> On 18 May 2011, at 16:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> >>>> I also bumped into the same problem. For the case of Mondrian, I will copy >>>> the missing classes into Mondrian. >>>> These classes were removed quite some times ago from Pharo 1.3 >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> On 18 May 2011, at 08:54, Tudor Girba wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Circle seems to be gone from Pharo 1.3. >>>>> >>>>> What is now the preferred way to specify a circle? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Doru >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>>> >>>>> "When people care, great things can happen." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get." > > > >
