yes, there was. It is like that because that is how it is in JUnit.... everybody agreed it was rare and if I'm not wrong, was going to be changed
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Guillermo Polito <[email protected] > wrote: > I remember a thread about this not long ago... Try searching the history > :) > > Guille > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> In my unit test, I want to make sure that my output equals the >> expectedOutput, but: >> TestCase>>assert: expected equals: actual >> >> It feels wrong to me. It seems that I want to make an assertion about my >> class's behavior and I would like to write: >> self assert: output equals: expectedOutput. >> >> What do you all think? >> >> Thanks. >> Sean >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/assert-equals-feels-backwards-tp3614760p3614760.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > -- *Hernán Wilkinson Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 email: [email protected] site: http://www.10Pines.com <http://www.10pines.com/>* Address: Paraguay 523, Floor 7 N, Buenos Aires, Argentina
