On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <
[email protected]> wrote:

> did you check this
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4129
> ?
>

Yes, I was the gulty. But I am still on favor. So I don't undersatnd Sean's
problem.


>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> In my unit test, I want to make sure that my output equals the
>> expectedOutput, but:
>>    TestCase>>assert: expected equals: actual
>>
>> It feels wrong to me. It seems that I want to make an assertion about my
>> class's behavior and I would like to write:
>>    self assert: output equals: expectedOutput.
>>
>> What do you all think?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Sean
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://forum.world.st/assert-equals-feels-backwards-tp3614760p3614760.html
>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>


-- 
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

Reply via email to