On Jun 30, 2011, at 3:06 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
> Another aspect of it, that build servers has a limited space (Marcus
> has to cut the number of builds , since they taking too much space).
> While on gforge we can afford to keep much more.
> Of course keeping latest 'frozen' build doesn't takes too much ,
> except of a little nuisiance after a couple of years
> every time you open a jenkins, you will see a very long list of jobs,
> where only few of them actually needed.
> That's why i thinking that moving things to archive is preferable.
>
> In any way, i think everyone understands that nobody wants to hide
> existing versions from public eyes.
> Its only a question of finding appropriate place for them, after
> development is done.
Yes... we can keep 1.2 a bit. But what I don't want to keep are builds
*on top* of 1.2. (the only left now is AIDA, but I removed already some).
The amount of project on the build server is already very high:
https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/
and that with almost all 1.2 clients deleted and stuff moved to Jenkins:
https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/
But it's fun how something is seen as indespensable that we did not
have some month ago (and that some people thought is not important
*and* in the Squeak past even actively blocked from happening).
How times change... ;-)
What this shows is that what Jenkins/Hudson provide is essential,
and we should think about to move that somehow deeper into our
language... (nice research topic)
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
