On Jun 29, 2011, at 11:12 PM, Stephan Eggermont wrote:

> Igor wrote:
>> On 29 June 2011 15:56, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab at anest.ufl.edu wrote:
>>> Having an archive seems sufficient - those who need old versions for use or 
>>> research can get them; they don't have to be clogging up the build server.  
>>> Sounds great.
>> 
>> Indeed. If people would like to use older releases, they should look
>> for another place, not for build server.
>> Since build server are there to build & test bleeding-edge (under
>> development) versions, but not ones which already released and years
>> old.
> 
> Ok, so you simply do not want the builds to be used by others. 
> That's fine.

why do you say that?

What is the point to have a build server build all the time the same same same 
same same 
same same image?

For the sake of it?

Stef

> 
> Stephan Eggermont
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to