On Jul 15, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > I am starting to build a 1.3 image, and taking the usual look around for > things that would get lost. SerialPort>>openPort: appears to address named > ports, but it looks like it will miss failures. What I did for 1.1 is > capture the result of the primitives and raise an error if it is nil. Any > interest?
yes send code :) > As an aside, does anyone know the state of serial ports on Linux? With Cog? > I have been having good luck with native ports using Andreas' Windows VM. I > have not done as well on my Linux laptop, but I can't tell whether that is > related to Linux, the Linux VM, or (my lead theory) USB-serial converters. I > need to get Ubuntu on a box with native ports and put it where I can stress > test serial I/O; it has been a elusive combination, but I will get there. > > Bill > > > >
