http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4527

Stef


On Jul 16, 2011, at 11:43 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

> Stef,
> 
> Excellent - attached.  Pharo already opens by port number or name, so the two 
> remaining steps are to save the result of the primitive and then to 
> conditionally raise an error.  If all was well, save the port ID (which Pharo 
> already does).
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] 
> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse 
> [[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 4:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] SerialPort>>openPort:
> 
> On Jul 15, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> 
>> I am starting to build a 1.3 image, and taking the usual look around for 
>> things that would get lost.  SerialPort>>openPort: appears to address named 
>> ports, but it looks like it will miss failures.  What I did for 1.1 is 
>> capture the result of the primitives and raise an error if it is nil.  Any 
>> interest?
> 
> yes
> send code :)
> 
>> As an aside, does anyone know the state of serial ports on Linux?  With Cog? 
>>  I have been having good luck with native ports using Andreas' Windows VM.  
>> I have not done as well on my Linux laptop, but I can't tell whether that is 
>> related to Linux, the Linux VM, or (my lead theory) USB-serial converters.  
>> I need to get Ubuntu on a box with native ports and put it where I can 
>> stress test serial I/O; it has been a elusive combination, but I will get 
>> there.
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> <SerialPort-openPort.st>


Reply via email to