On 21 July 2011 20:29, Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> it depends on your scenario and when users do not use or use the tool >> differently you get different feedback. > > Or even better: if noboy says anything in the last 6 months while Pharo 1.3 > was being developed/tested then we cannot do magic. > I am tired of saying that anything that YOU don't test, can be broken. >
why "can be"? it definitely will be broken. What would be nice is to write tests for TimeProfileBrowser to prevent regressions. Any ideas? -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
