On Jul 30, 2011, at 2:42 PM, David T. Lewis wrote: > I believe that the license issue has been resolved with an MIT licensed > release of the CameraPlugin plugin and support code. > > Discussion is on vm-dev: > <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2011-July/008973.html>
Thanks david. This is much clearer. :) http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7654 > > And a copy of the MIT code is attached to a new Mantis issue here: > <http://bugs.squeak.org/view_all_bug_page.php?page_number=1> > > Dave > > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:02:31AM +0200, St?phane Ducasse wrote: >> It depends on a dependencies also at the vm level and how they can crip in >> the system. >> >> Stef >> >> On Jul 30, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Hilaire Fernandes wrote: >> >>> But anyway, I guess you don't want to include it in PharoCore, so the >>> license issue is not the concern of PharoTeam, right? >>> In the other hand, if a third party want to use it, it will have to find >>> its own way to comply with the license. >>> >>> Hilaire >>> >>> Le 29/07/2011 15:20, Marcus Denker a ?crit : >>>> >>>> On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Bernat Romagosa wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sure, I attach it here. >>>>> >>>>> It looks like a standard MIT license with just these extra conditions >>>>> added. >>>>> >>>> And with >>> >>> -- >>> Education 0.2 -- http://blog.ofset.org/hilaire >>> >>> >> >
