I believe that the license issue has been resolved with an MIT licensed release of the CameraPlugin plugin and support code.
Discussion is on vm-dev: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2011-July/008973.html> And a copy of the MIT code is attached to a new Mantis issue here: <http://bugs.squeak.org/view_all_bug_page.php?page_number=1> Dave On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:02:31AM +0200, St?phane Ducasse wrote: > It depends on a dependencies also at the vm level and how they can crip in > the system. > > Stef > > On Jul 30, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Hilaire Fernandes wrote: > > > But anyway, I guess you don't want to include it in PharoCore, so the > > license issue is not the concern of PharoTeam, right? > > In the other hand, if a third party want to use it, it will have to find > > its own way to comply with the license. > > > > Hilaire > > > > Le 29/07/2011 15:20, Marcus Denker a ?crit : > >> > >> On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Bernat Romagosa wrote: > >> > >>> Sure, I attach it here. > >>> > >>> It looks like a standard MIT license with just these extra conditions > >>> added. > >>> > >> And with > > > > -- > > Education 0.2 -- http://blog.ofset.org/hilaire > > > > >
