On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>>> Nautilus looks to me like yet another Smalltalk-80 browser that works
>>> exactly the same as all previous Smalltalk browsers in the last 32
>>> years (including OB). IMHO fixed lists, a text field and ugly buttons
>>> do not cut it anymore. Did any Smalltalker ever work with XCode,
>>> Eclipse, VisualStudio, ...?
>>
>> Have a "basic" browser so that we can get rid of StringHolder.
>
> You could push down all the code of StringHolder into the subclass(es)
> and remove the empty class. This can be done with RB with a few
> clicks.
>
>> No more for me.
>
> Introducing more code into Pharo that depends on more parts of Pharo
> (RPackage, Announcement, Pragma, Ring, RB, Shout, ...) doesn't make it
> easier to maintain and change Pharo. Or did I misunderstand something
> about cohesion and coupling? :-)
>
With that philosophy, we can just declare Pharo as finished and do something
else.
My point of view is that I invent new abstractions *and than use them* on and
for the system itself.
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
