On Aug 29, 2011, at 10:56 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Lukas, > > On 29 Aug 2011, at 19:53, Lukas Renggli wrote: > >> I disagree; I would like a small and stable Pharo in which crazy ideas >> can be realized. For that I don't need fancy abstractions, but a >> minimal, simple and absolutely stable system in which I can load and >> do whatever I want. Maybe this is just me? > > I guess it all depends on your point of view. I can imagine that for you a > clean minimal core is important as you build your own universe. But for most > regular users, more stuff is needed. In practice, the core/dev difference was > not optimal for all the reasons given before. I really feel crippled in a > core image. And I don't like having to do long builds myself. > > I switched to 1.3, but I am using your one-click image because I need Seaside > and there is no client build in Pharo any more. (Thx, BTW ;-) > Seaside builds for 1.3 and 1.4 are on my TODO list (like far too many other things). ESUG is nice, but it cuts into the time...
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
