On 31 August 2011 22:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 31 Aug 2011, at 20:04, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> No, honestly I just want to be ablet to release at all... Perfection (TM) is >> for the next release. >> >>> on Mac OS X, the About menu should be changed to 'About Pharo', the Help >>> menu should be changed to 'Pharo Help'; some items on the World menu have >>> no icon, most notably the System Browser and Transcript. >>> >> Patches are welcome... keep in mind that system menu related things might >> require VM changes and might take a while. > > I think the Mac OS X menu definition is in MainMenu.nib (I just can't seem to > simply open it with the new Xcode 4) > > Smalltalk tools browser taskbarIcon > > returns nil in WorldState class>>#mostUsedToolsOn: > > it used to be > > Browser taskbarIcon > > something Igor did in March ;-) > > I guess he just forgot to copy/move something. > > Also, once there existed a > > TranscriptWindow smallTranscriptIcon > > but it is no longer in the image (see WorldState class>>#otherToolsOn:) >
Please open a ticket. I easily forgetting things. :) I remember when i dealing with it, i had to remove some icons, because the protocol(s) are a bit fuzzy. ah yeah.. transcript.. of course, because we had to port ThreadSafeTranscript back again. so icon lost because of that. In this regard, i like the idea of ?Marcus? who proposed to use a virtual filesystem inside of image to store binary blobs, instead of keeping data base64-encoded in compiled methods etc. I think we should consider how to move to that direction, once we will have new and shiny FileSystem there :) >>> Also, I think that it would be very cool if a normal user like me can take >>> the image and run all unit tests and be amazed that they all pass: that >>> would really inspire new users and instill a quality feeling. >>> >> Known bug, has something to do with networking. >> >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4495 > > Yeah, this is really weird, without all Network and Zinc tests the TestRunner > completes its run (with some failures/errors). But running the Network and/or > Zinc tests afterwards seperately just works (they even all pass). It must > have something to do with resource cleanup. We should go over all tests and > check a bit (hmm ;-). Still on the CI servers it works. > > Sven > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
