Am 26.09.2011 um 18:19 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse: > sure it will
Now I see why it wasn't integrated. The fix is not that easy as it is in the bug entry. > Now did you check the motivation? Of the issue? Of course, to get time information that contains milliseconds and not only seconds. > Was it good? I think yes. The milliSecondClock is nothing reliable. You need to fiddle with it to get a real millisecond value. > Worth to get it in? Yes, I need to be able to measure milliseconds. I could use milliSecondClock but I think it is good for pharo to integrate it into DateAndTime properly. Norbert > On Sep 26, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > >> >> Am 26.09.2011 um 16:40 schrieb Marcus Denker: >> >>> >>> On Sep 26, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: >>> >>>> Does anybody know what happened to >>>> >>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3236 >>>> >>>> In pharo-1.3 and pharo-1.4 they aren't in. Well, that matches the status >>>> of FixedWaitingToBePharoed. Last change by Marcus is from April 7th. >>>> >>> >>> Every issue not closed has yet to be done. >>> >>> So the anwer is: Nothing happend. >>> >> Ok, >> >> there was only a diff so I guess it was more manual work to have it >> integrated. I'm redoing the stuff on a fresh 1.4 image so it can be easily >> integrated. I hope this will help getting it in. >> >> Norbert >> >> >> > >
