tx for the information On Sep 26, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
> > Am 26.09.2011 um 18:19 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse: > >> sure it will > > Now I see why it wasn't integrated. The fix is not that easy as it is in the > bug entry. > >> Now did you check the motivation? > > Of the issue? Of course, to get time information that contains milliseconds > and not only seconds. > >> Was it good? > > I think yes. The milliSecondClock is nothing reliable. You need to fiddle > with it to get a real millisecond value. > >> Worth to get it in? > > Yes, I need to be able to measure milliseconds. I could use milliSecondClock > but I think it is good for pharo to integrate it into DateAndTime properly. > > Norbert > >> On Sep 26, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: >> >>> >>> Am 26.09.2011 um 16:40 schrieb Marcus Denker: >>> >>>> >>>> On Sep 26, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: >>>> >>>>> Does anybody know what happened to >>>>> >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3236 >>>>> >>>>> In pharo-1.3 and pharo-1.4 they aren't in. Well, that matches the status >>>>> of FixedWaitingToBePharoed. Last change by Marcus is from April 7th. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Every issue not closed has yet to be done. >>>> >>>> So the anwer is: Nothing happend. >>>> >>> Ok, >>> >>> there was only a diff so I guess it was more manual work to have it >>> integrated. I'm redoing the stuff on a fresh 1.4 image so it can be easily >>> integrated. I hope this will help getting it in. >>> >>> Norbert >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
