On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> >>> Well...thanks guys. The point is taken. Thanks Philip, Bill and all who >>> gave feedback and suggestions. We are aware of this and we are already >>> discussing with Martin possible solutions and analyzing all the things that >>> has been said in this thread. >>> We will keep you informed. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >> Just one thing I hadn't seen discussed. Is Fuel possibly a way to >> exchange objects/data between users/systems ? > > > Yes > > But it doesn't mean it is the best option. Maybe a XML or JSON serializer is better there... > In which case it would have to deal with different systems having different >> versions of Fuel. >> >> > Exactly. It doesn't matter whether the different versions of Fuel happens > in your own image or in different systems. So yes, it is the same problem. > Note this is not only a problem for Fuel, but for any serializer which does > not manages full backward compatibility between versions. > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
