On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Benjamin < [email protected]> wrote:
> > On Oct 31, 2011, at 9:56 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > - Once again... I would LOVE to have a really working-out-of-the-box > multithreaded FFI with callbacks. > This is a MUST if Pharo wants to be business friendly. > > - Unify the VMs. Have only ONE place where a single pharo user can go and > pickup a VM. Have ANOTHER place for those bleeding edge or experiment VMs. > This means merging gforge, jenkins, pharo website, pharo one click, etc. > In addition, we need a way to IDENTIFY a VM. So that when someone reports > a bug, we can exactly know which VM to reproduce it. > > - Integrate Nautilus with RB. Nobody (ok, most of us) cannot work without > RB integration. Ok, integrations could live without that, but they > INTEGRATE. If you are DEVELOPING you cannot develop without RB. If nobody > will make OB to work in 1.4, then someone needs to integrate Nautilus with > RB, otherwise people will stick with 1.3 and never change. > > > I am on it, but it's long, i have to understand fully how it works, and > since I never really used it (I am still a newbie ^^) it's not so easy. > Moreover I have to go through OB code which is still obscure to me. > > that's why I say "someone" and not Ben :) > But it progresses step by step :) > > > Sure, and continue like that! > Ben > > - Make development really tools work in Pharo 1.4: OCompletion, Shout > > - Continue pushing Coral, Zinc, Ocean, DBXTalk, Fuel, Nautilus, etc. > > - Maintain issue tracker: let's give Marcus a rest. This means tagging > issues, close them, validate, etc etc etc. > > Cheers > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I can't take credit for thinking of the bridge, I was simply >> acknowledging it and the breadth of its audience as part of my shameless >> attempt to direct effort toward another feature that would get a lot of use >> :) >> >> Bill >> >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: [email protected] [ >> [email protected]] on behalf of Sean P. >> DeNigris [[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:22 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Brainstorming on the roadmap for first Pharo >> Consortium Engineer :) >> >> Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: >> > >> > The object-c bridge is probably a big deal to the Mac users among us, >> > right? >> >> Yes! Thank you for the reminder, I'd temporarily given up and forgotten >> about this. A stable, well-documented ObjC bridge would be /huge/. My >> inability to effectively use it was one of the key drivers in my delving >> into debugging the VM. Like FFI, I think documentation will be extremely >> important here. >> >> Sean >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Brainstorming-on-the-roadmap-for-first-Pharo-Consortium-Engineer-tp3955399p3959945.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
