2011/11/2 Eliot Miranda <[email protected]> > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> - Once again... I would LOVE to have a really working-out-of-the-box >> multithreaded FFI with callbacks. >> > > and for me to finish my part of this (the VM implementation and Alien > support) I need review of my VM code. Since Cadence want this too I should > be in a position to spend considerable time on it in a few weeks. >
really great news! Luc > > >> This is a MUST if Pharo wants to be business friendly. >> > > I couldn't agree more. A platform must have an excellent FFI to be useful. > > >> >> - Unify the VMs. Have only ONE place where a single pharo user can go and >> pickup a VM. Have ANOTHER place for those bleeding edge or experiment VMs. >> This means merging gforge, jenkins, pharo website, pharo one click, etc. >> In addition, we need a way to IDENTIFY a VM. So that when someone reports >> a bug, we can exactly know which VM to reproduce it. >> >> - Integrate Nautilus with RB. Nobody (ok, most of us) cannot work without >> RB integration. Ok, integrations could live without that, but they >> INTEGRATE. If you are DEVELOPING you cannot develop without RB. If nobody >> will make OB to work in 1.4, then someone needs to integrate Nautilus with >> RB, otherwise people will stick with 1.3 and never change. >> >> - Make development really tools work in Pharo 1.4: OCompletion, Shout >> >> - Continue pushing Coral, Zinc, Ocean, DBXTalk, Fuel, Nautilus, etc. >> >> - Maintain issue tracker: let's give Marcus a rest. This means tagging >> issues, close them, validate, etc etc etc. >> >> Cheers >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I can't take credit for thinking of the bridge, I was simply >>> acknowledging it and the breadth of its audience as part of my shameless >>> attempt to direct effort toward another feature that would get a lot of use >>> :) >>> >>> Bill >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: [email protected] [ >>> [email protected]] on behalf of Sean P. >>> DeNigris [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:22 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Brainstorming on the roadmap for first >>> Pharo Consortium Engineer :) >>> >>> Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: >>> > >>> > The object-c bridge is probably a big deal to the Mac users among us, >>> > right? >>> >>> Yes! Thank you for the reminder, I'd temporarily given up and forgotten >>> about this. A stable, well-documented ObjC bridge would be /huge/. My >>> inability to effectively use it was one of the key drivers in my delving >>> into debugging the VM. Like FFI, I think documentation will be extremely >>> important here. >>> >>> Sean >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://forum.world.st/Brainstorming-on-the-roadmap-for-first-Pharo-Consortium-Engineer-tp3955399p3959945.html >>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Mariano >> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >> >> > > > -- > best, > Eliot > >
