Hi Esteban. I DID notice that the book was "outdated". The thing is that we have to decide, as the Pharo community, if it is outdated or just another alternative. Eliot's way of building the VM is different than "our". We use ConfigurationOfCog + CMakeVMMaker + Git. Eliot uses another way. So what is documented in the pharo book is kind of Eliot way. We have to decide as a community what do we expect when building cog. Is ConfigurationOfCog + CMakeVMMaker + Git the OFFICIAL Pharo way of building the VM? If we do agree on this, then yes, we should update the book. Something different is if ConfigurationOfCog + CMakeVMMaker + Git is just ANOTHER way of bulding the VM, in which case I don't see as incorrect what is in the pharo book.
What do you think? On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > Checking the pharo colaboractive book, I found that the VM building is old > and it is not compatible anymore with our current process. Maybe "someone" > (cough, cough, Mariano, cough, cough) could update it with better > information? > > Cheers, > Esteban > > pd: also... I'm a little worried about nobody noticing this before. That > means people does not use pharo book? I think is a great way to share > information, but maybe there is not much people aware of it... I know, > there is a link in "external links" in main page and is top in > "documentation"... I don't know if we can do it more visible or clear? > ppd: I'd rearrange "pharo tools" section by adding subsections like: > "Persistence", "Web", etc., today looks a little bit confusing, IMHO. > pppd: yeah... today is my "stupid questions" day... :P > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
