Yes Yesterday we looked at basicLoad implementation and compared with the squeak one. But igor' conclusions was that this is the same but we should relook at it.
>>>> I can't claim to know exactly, but I seem to remember it does batches of >>>> new, then changed, then removed methods. > Other than that, I think they happen "seemingly" at random. > There are many sorts of internal dependencies, so other than the old > workaround of making multiple .mcz's without internal dependencies, one kind > of needs an insight into what exactly was at fault here to see if anything > could be improved of the loading order in the general case, which does not > simultaneously break something else... > > Cheers, > Henry >
