On 29 December 2011 15:44, Benoit St-Jean <[email protected]> wrote: > I was wondering what is planned regarding packages available on SqueakSource > and Pharo. More and more packages can't load in Pharo and it gets more and > more frustrating not being able to load anything without having to > add/modify methods/classes all over the place so those packages can load > properly in Pharo. Are we looking at a Pharo-only kind of SqueakSource in > the future ? > > Besides, having to handle platform specific (i.e. Pharo vs Squeak) for every > package is adding more complexity than what is needed. I know backward > compatibility was thrown away from the start to avoid compromises in Pharo > but how do we take care of the fact that as each day passes, less and less > stuff from SqueakSource is usable in Pharo ? > The recipe is simple: maintenance.
If you really care, spend time maintaining packages you using. If nobody cares to maintain the software, it is dead. It is only a matter of time for it to get broken. We cannot give any guarantee that something which worked fine 10 years ago will keep working today, without keeping everything unchanged. If you have a garden and planted a rose there, do you expect that 5 years later it will still grow there, without you taking care of it? -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
