On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 29 December 2011 15:44, Benoit St-Jean <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I was wondering what is planned regarding packages available on
> SqueakSource
> > and Pharo.  More and more packages can't load in Pharo and it gets more
> and
> > more frustrating not being able to load anything without having to
> > add/modify methods/classes all over the place so those packages can load
> > properly in Pharo.  Are we looking at a Pharo-only kind of SqueakSource
> in
> > the future ?
> >
> > Besides, having to handle platform specific (i.e. Pharo vs Squeak) for
> every
> > package is adding more complexity than what is needed.  I know backward
> > compatibility was thrown away from the start to avoid compromises in
> Pharo
> > but how do we take care of the fact that as each day passes, less and
> less
> > stuff from SqueakSource is usable in Pharo ?
> >
> The recipe is simple: maintenance.
>
> If you really care, spend time maintaining packages you using.
> If nobody cares to maintain the software, it is dead.
> It is only a matter of time for it to get broken.
> We cannot give any guarantee that something which worked fine 10 years
> ago will keep working today,
> without keeping everything unchanged.
>
> If you have a garden and planted a rose there, do you expect that 5
> years later it will still grow there, without you taking care of it?
>


Igor, I think he is not criticizing that. What he points out is not the
lack of maintenance but a clear way of knowing which project/packages are
expected to work or not in Pharo. If you take a random package/project from
SS there is no way to know that. Having a Pharo catalog/certified
packages/projects would help here.

Cheers


>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
>
>


-- 
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

Reply via email to