On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Lawson English wrote: > Does Pharo use Morphic? Is there a conscious decision on people's parts to > NOT try and keep the various flavors of Morphic compatible, or is it just > "too hard," or that people don't care, or think it irrelevant? > > Some graphical frameworks manage to keep a centralized core of classes > because they are created by one group of people for one language and then > bindings ported to other languages. Morphic is unique in that it is being > [re]implemented in 3 different languages: Self, Smalltalk (with several > variations within that branch) and JavaScript. Is there any way, or even > desire, to coordinate between the differing versions?
are you serious? Please can we continue to build our future instead of talking about the one of others? Stef
