> what ? since when morphic is the future of "others" ? > > I am confused, does not Pharo use morphic ? Does not Pharo care for mophic ?
Pharo uses Morphic. Now we will not make it compatible with the one of Self or javascript. > I am new with Pharo but I have not seen any other GUI than Morphic , > distributed as standard by Pharo unless I am missing something here ? Am I ? > > From: Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2012, 19:03 > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] keeping up with lively-kernel (morphic) > > > On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Lawson English wrote: > > > Does Pharo use Morphic? Is there a conscious decision on people's parts to > > NOT try and keep the various flavors of Morphic compatible, or is it just > > "too hard," or that people don't care, or think it irrelevant? > > > > Some graphical frameworks manage to keep a centralized core of classes > > because they are created by one group of people for one language and then > > bindings ported to other languages. Morphic is unique in that it is being > > [re]implemented in 3 different languages: Self, Smalltalk (with several > > variations within that branch) and JavaScript. Is there any way, or even > > desire, to coordinate between the differing versions? > > are you serious? > Please can we continue to build our future instead of talking about the one > of others? > > Stef > >
